From a payment table to a single source of truth

Reorganising Payments around how firms actually manage their money.

From a payment table to a single source of truth

Company

Role

Lead Product Designer

Impact

~2x MAU 7,8K

Year

2022–2024

Project Overview

Ignition is a billing and payments platform for accounting and professional-services firms.

Payments is where firms manage what happens after they ask clients for money. But the experience had evolved around how Ignition processed payments, rather than how firms managed getting paid.

I led the redesign of Collections, working with Product and Engineering from research through launch. The goal was to turn it from a temporary processing view into a persistent, searchable record firms could use to manage payments every day. I also helped shape the product boundary and the next direction as new evidence emerged.

The Problem

Collections showed where a payment was. Then it lost the record.

The old collections page was organised around short-term payment and payout states: Collecting (Processing, Paying soon, Next payout), Pending collections, Rejected, Verifying. For a payment in progress, that worked. Firms could see where their money was and when it was likely to reach them.

But firms needed more than the status of a payment. They needed to understand the bigger picture across all of their payments.

Old Collections payment states
Legacy Collections page

Once a payment was paid out, it disappeared from Collections.

That’s where the experience broke down. There was no history, search, or filtering to look back and understand what had happened to a payment.

Old Collections: a snapshot of payments in progress

Without that history, firms had to create their own record. They cross-checked Ignition against spreadsheets and other systems, adding extra work and, in some cases, the risk of collecting from a client twice.

What firms needed: a complete view of their payments

Define

Deciding what Collections should solve

Research showed that firms needed support beyond tracking individual payments. They were managing several connected parts of getting paid, from invoicing clients to understanding what money was coming next.

But these needs did not all belong in the same product experience. The challenge was to define what Collections should own and where its boundaries should sit.

Asking for money, getting paid, knowing what’s coming

Solving now: Help firms get paid

  • Complete payment history

  • Clear status and progress

  • Failures that need attention

  • Actions to resolve payment issues

Not solving yet: Broader money-management needs

  • End-to-end invoicing

  • Full cash flow forecasting

  • Broader financial planning

Redesign

Rebuilding Collections around the payment journey

The redesign centred on one idea: make the full payment journey understandable, visible, and actionable, from collection through payout.

Redesigned Collections, All tabAfter
Legacy Collections pageBefore
‹ ›

01. Match the firm’s mental model: From how Ignition processes payments to how firms think about getting paid

The old Collections page was organised around when Ignition would send funds. That worked for payout timing, but firms had broader questions:

Who’s paid? What’s still outstanding? What needs my attention?

Getting paid involves two movements of money: the client paying, then Ignition paying those funds out to the firm. The old experience made the second clear, but gave much less visibility into the first.

From payout timing to the firm’s mental model

The model, not just the labels, needed to change

Customer insights, competitive research, and testing showed the same gap: Collections reflected Ignition’s payment process, while firms thought about managing getting paid.

So rather than simply renaming the existing states, the experience was reorganised around the firm’s mental model.

02. Keep the payment record: From a temporary queue to a persistent history

Previously, payments moved through Collections like items in a queue. Once paid out, they disappeared.

The redesign kept completed payments visible, creating a payment history firms could search and return to.

From a temporary queue to a persistent history

03. Make problems actionable: From seeing what happened to knowing what to do next

The old experience showed a payment’s state, but what to do next was often unclear. Firms had to open the invoice, read through its activity, and work out which actions were available for that payment.

Match the action to the state

A payment can reach sixteen states: the collection lifecycle from not started through to paid out, plus verification, refunds and disputes. Each one has a different sensible next step, and working out that mapping was most of the design work. Sometimes the right answer was no action at all, since nothing can safely change while money is moving.

Payment states mapped to actions

Resolve issues where they happen

The actions then moved into the payment record itself. Depending on the state, a firm could reschedule, share a payment link so the client pays directly, request a refund, or cancel, without leaving the table or contacting Support.

One place to understand, find, and act on payments.

  • Collections view
  • Collections view
  • Collections view
  • Collections view
  • Collections view

Evolve

What we learned after launch

The redesign centred on one idea: make the full payment journey understandable, visible, and actionable, from collection through payout.